Beth 2.0 — Babylon 2k expertise collection guide Narrated edition; Magnific MCP / Willa Ashford. All examples fictional. 00:00:00.000 — Start with a founder’s situation Welcome to the Beth expertise collection guide. This interview helps Babylon 2k turn professional experience into better questions, clearer service scopes and more useful estimates for founders. A useful answer changes a specific decision: which service is needed, how much work it involves, who can do it, or when Beth must ask a human. The form is organised around those decisions. It is not a request to upload everything you know, and saving an answer does not automatically retrain a language model. 00:00:40.875 — One case. Three viewpoints. We will follow one fictional example: a small online clothing seller in Quezon City, with eighty sales and expense events in one month. The founder wants organised monthly records. Their tax status still needs checking. A specialist describes the work, a manager describes packaging and pricing policy, and an expert checks the evidence and safe boundaries. These are separate studies of the same situation. All model answers in this guide are teaching examples, not measured job evidence, approved prices or current legal advice. 00:01:20.292 — Create your collection account Open Team interview. Choose Create account if you are new. Enter your name, an email address and a password of at least ten characters, then confirm it. If you already use a local Beth account, choose Sign in and use that account. Registration, sign-in and saving work on this local server. They are separate from the Babylon website login. Email verification and email-based password recovery are not configured, so keep your password safely. After signing in, Your saved studies lets you reopen your previous work. 00:02:00.667 — Choose the part you know Choose New study. Select Specialist, Manager or Expert, then choose one service from the catalogue. The role selects the questions, rather than giving you publication rights. Start with a service you know well. You do not need to answer the whole catalogue. For a second service or a different role, create a separate study. This keeps unrelated answers apart and makes comparisons fair. Specialists have eight topics; managers and experts each have six. 00:02:36.000 — Make the example comparable Complete the founder situation before describing effort or fees. State the business activity, concern, business type, known tax status, covered period and review owner. Use the same anonymised case code across the related role studies. Use Not yet known where appropriate. For our example, say: online clothing seller, monthly books and filing, sole proprietor, one month, tax status needs review. Name the responsible review team rather than inventing an approver. Keep it anonymised. Do not enter client names, tax identification numbers, bank details or private client documents. This context tells a reviewer which situations your answers cover. 00:03:29.917 — Unknown is a useful answer Every topic gives you three choices: I can answer, I need to check, or Not applicable. Choose I need to check when an important fact is missing. Write what is unknown, who can confirm it and the next useful step. For example: our coordinator will check the number of bank accounts from the founder before the quote is finalised. Not applicable also needs a reason. Do not turn an unknown into a zero or an invented answer. Beth needs a safe route for uncertainty just as much as it needs a normal route. 00:04:19.167 — Define what one unit buys In the specialist study, first define one unit of work. A strong model answer is: one covered month, up to one hundred recorded sales and expense events, one business. State what is included, what is excluded, what must be ready and how often the work repeats. Our example includes classification, posting and a monthly summary. It excludes bank reconciliation, past-period cleanup and tax return filing. A phrase such as basic bookkeeping is too vague. A bounded unit helps Beth explain exactly what the founder is buying. 00:05:04.167 — Separate hours from waiting Next, describe a comparable job. Record delivery hours, reviewer hours and coordination hours separately from elapsed working days. Our fictional illustration uses four delivery hours, one review hour and half an hour of coordination: five and a half productive hours altogether. Three working days of elapsed time is not three days of additional billable labour. The example has zero measured jobs, so its basis is Professional estimate. If you use Measured completed jobs, provide a positive comparable-job count and an anonymised evidence reference. Say what made the job easier or harder. 00:05:52.167 — Ask a question a founder can answer Now write the easy founder question that changes the work. For example: about how many sales and expense entries do you have in a usual month? Define the counted item, the threshold, the service consequence and the route for Not sure. A proposed rule might include the first one hundred events and add a separately priced volume block above that. A reviewer must approve the threshold. Avoid asking for annual revenue when the work actually depends on transaction count. Document readiness, finished outputs, skills, availability and conflicts complete the specialist view. 00:06:40.709 — Package an outcome The manager study starts with the founder’s desired result. Build the smallest package that achieves it. Identify required services, prerequisites, optional additions and exclusions. For our seller, monthly bookkeeping could be the core. Bank reconciliation is a separately scoped service when the founder needs it. A missed-filing diagnostic belongs only when that separate concern is confirmed. Do not add every service simply because it exists. The package should describe the outcome in plain language and allow the founder to confirm the scope before an estimate is accepted. 00:07:25.167 — Give prices a visible basis The pricing topic collects role costs, overhead, fixed costs, target margin, rounding and the fee period. It also asks when additional work changes the estimate and who approves it. In the model example, five and a half hours are combined with separate delivery, review and coordination rates. The guide shows the calculation as an illustrative policy proposal, not a market norm or an approved quotation. Record currency and units carefully. A margin on selling price differs from adding a markup to cost. Keep overlapping tasks counted once, and record any package credit with its reason. 00:08:08.125 — Capture the exact evidence The expert study turns professional judgement into a rule that can be checked. State when it applies, what changes it and what service or human review follows. For authority, record the exact document title, official URL, section or paragraph and any amendments. A homepage link is not enough. Record the effective period, the date checked, a review owner and the conditions that trigger another check. A source can be genuine but out of date or irrelevant to the founder. If applicability is unresolved, explain the gap and keep the answer pending. 00:08:50.042 — Test the exception too Write examples that prove the proposed rule works: a straightforward case, a complex case, an unknown fact, a blocked situation and a case where Beth should escalate. Include the expected next question, service route or boundary. Then identify who can approve a version, what evidence they need and how an unsafe rule would be withdrawn. These inputs support a managed knowledge library, pricing rules and test cases. They do not mean the system has already built live web verification, an approval workflow or automatic model training. 00:09:37.042 — Check the pack before submitting Choose Check answers. Review the founder situation, each topic and the items still needing attention. The captured count checks coverage and formatting, not truth or legal accuracy. You can leave honest gaps for the reviewer. Changes save automatically; Save now provides an explicit check. A newer revision in another tab stops an outdated save instead of silently overwriting it. Before recording a submission, confirm that the information is anonymised and may be stored for review. The submission preserves that version while later draft edits remain possible. 00:10:19.084 — The output is a candidate rules pack Download the review pack and give it to the named reviewer. It includes typed answers, evidence basis, unknowns, question-to-use links and submitted snapshots. Earlier interview answers are preserved and can accompany the export. On this local installation, submission does not send an email, share a team inbox or update live Beth rules. The responsible team must reconcile conflicting contributions, verify evidence, approve a version and test it before publication. Print review provides a readable copy; the download keeps the structured data. 00:10:59.959 — What a useful result looks like At the end, the founder concern connects to an easy question, a confirmed fact, a bounded service unit, an effort and pricing proposal, a suitable specialist and a testable boundary. For our fictional seller, the result is a clearly scoped monthly service with tax status still pending, rather than a confident guess about compliance. Before you finish your own study, ask: could another professional understand the work, check the evidence and spot when this answer stops applying? Specific, honest, reviewable answers are what help Beth become useful. Start with one service and improve it with real experience.